Essay

Hudibras and Ralph taken Prisoner c.1664–77 by Francis Le Piper

Read technical information about this painting resulting from examination and scientific analysis by conservators and conservation scientists at Tate

Francis Le Piper ?16401695 Hudibras and Ralph taken Prisoner c.1664-77 Oil paint on panel 232 x 432 mm T00248

Fig.1
Francis Le Piper ?1640–1695
Hudibras and Ralph taken Prisoner
c.1664–77
Oil paint on panel
232 x 432 mm
T00248

This painting is in oil paint on wooden panel measuring 232 x 432 mm (fig.1). The panel is a single piece of oak, cut tangentially and with uneven thickness. It is up to 5 mm thick. The grain of the wood runs horizontally (figs.2–4). An ‘L-section’ oak batten, about 30 mm wide and 10 mm deep is attached with glue to the top edge of the panel. There would have been similar battens on the other edges as part of an original framing device, which occurs also in the other three panels in this series (T00247, T00620 and T00621). Again like the other three panels, the wood could not be dated using the standard dendrochronological reference charts; this would indicate that the oak is British because the established data comes from trees that grew in the Baltic area.1 Owing to its irregular cutting and the presence of the batten, the panel has developed a complex warp and has been subject to splitting in the past.

The ground is opaque salmon pink and extends all over the front of the panel (figs.5–6). Brushstrokes from its application are visible here and there. It is composed of lead white, a range of earth pigments, Cologne earth, smalt and black, bound together in oil.2

No linear underdrawing is visible with the eye or with infrared (fig.7) but certain features were laid in with reddish brown and green paint, which was allowed to dry before the artists proceeded further.

Fig.7 Infrared reflectograph of Hudibras and Ralph taken Prisoner

Fig.7
Infrared reflectograph of Hudibras and Ralph taken Prisoner

Thereafter the painting appears to have been done in one layer, the colours mixed on the palette and worked into one another wet-in-wet on the prepared surface of the panel with bold, vigorous brushwork and fairly thick, creamy, opaque paint (figs.8–11).

The painting was treated for minor splitting in the panel and associated consolidation of paint in 1973. Otherwise it has needed no significant treatment since acquisition by Tate in 1959. The varnish is a natural resin.

November 2003

Close