BT: Bringing Innovation & Technology Together

Turner prize 2002

IntroductionShortlistJudging Panel | Critics | Discussion Forums | Questions & Answers

Teach Yourself Turner Prize Criticism

Remember the controversies of Turner Prizes past? Here's our quick reminder of what the papers said:

"  
Familiar rubbish on Turner shortlist

  "
         
    The Times    

Last year the appearance of Martin Creed and Mike Nelson on the shortlist focused criticism around the issue of rubbish - and money. The Times reported

"   A sheet of A4 paper scrunched up into a ball has been sold for £2,000
  "

by Creed, while Nelson

"   assembles rubbish - known in art circles as 'found objects' - to suggest scenarios such as the aftermath of a crime
  "

Charles Thompson, a founder-member of the Stuckists, a group campaigning for a return to more traditional forms of art, said Creed's work exuded

"   outstanding stupidity
  "

while The Guardian's critic heard a painter at the Turner Prize press conference attacking Mike Nelson's The Cosmic Legend of the Uroboros Serpent

"   I thought they were the Tate's storerooms. But you tell me now that they are a work of art. How could that be? So are the Tate's storerooms also a work of art?
  "

The work exhibited by the winning artist, Martin Creed (Work 227: The lights going on and off) was variously compared to

"   ongoing problems with the Tate Gallery's electrics
  "

and

"   a recognised form of torture
  "

It was, however, the work of one of the nominees who didn't actually make it onto the shortlist - Michael Landy - that provided what some saw as the most telling incident:

"   his still life composition of a bin full of rubbish at a London gallery was accidentally thrown away by a cleaner
  "