On the day that Tate Britain’s most famous Pre-Raphaelite paintings go back on display, we take a look at some little-known facts and bust some myths about the Victorian group

The blue plaque at 7 Gower Street celebrating the founding of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood

The blue plaque at 7 Gower Street celebrating the founding of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood


© Derek Kendall, English Heritage

1. They started off as a secret society

When John Everett Millais, William Holman Hunt, Dante Gabriel Rossetti and the other founders of the movement first began marking their paintings with the initials PRB in 1848, they refused to explain the mark. However by 1850 the meaning  - Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood - was leaked (possibly by Rossetti), and the society members and affiliates began to explain what they meant by it, just in time for the actual brotherhood to eventually dissolve in the early 1850s.

On 1 January, 1850, they published The Germ: Thoughts towards Nature in Poetry, Literature and Art  a shortlived periodical that proclaimed:

The endeavour held in view throughout the writings on
Art will be to encourage and enforce an entire adherence to
the simplicity of nature; and also to direct attention, as an
auxiliary medium, to the comparatively few works which Art
has yet produced in this spirit.

2. The PRB were radical in their time, and not everyone liked it

Sir John Everett Millais, Bt, 'Christ in the House of His Parents ('The Carpenter's Shop')' 1849-50

Sir John Everett Millais, Bt
Christ in the House of His Parents ('The Carpenter's Shop') 1849-50
Oil on canvas
support: 864 x 1397 mm frame: 1590 x 1873 x 141 mm
Purchased with assistance from the Art Fund and various subscribers 1921

View the main page for this artwork

 

In fact most of the establishment couldn’t bear it. These young artists aimed to overturn everything artists were being taught at the Royal Academy School; teachings that held up the Renaissance painter Raphael as the pinnacle of artistic achievement, but that the PRB saw as formulaic and backward looking. By going back ‘Pre-Raphael’ to medieval and early Renaissance painters, they planned to recapture what they saw as simplicity and truth in art. Inspired by the flat compositions and minute detail of these early paintings, particularly frescoes, they rejected any hierarchy of symbols in their paintings (giving equal weight to the figures and the environment surrounding them) they painted directly on to white grounds making their colours startlingly bright, and gave their forms sharp outlines with little shadow.

In 1850, Charles Dickens described Millais’s depiction of the Virgin Mary in Christ in the House of His Parents as a degenerate type, one who was ‘horrible in her ugliness’.

Dante Gabriel Rossetti, 'The Beloved ('The Bride')' 1865-6

Dante Gabriel Rossetti
The Beloved ('The Bride') 1865-6
Oil on canvas
support: 825 x 762 mm frame: 1220 x 1110 x 83 mm
Purchased with assistance from Sir Arthur Du Cros Bt and Sir Otto Beit KCMG through the Art Fund 1916

View the main page for this artwork

3. People really like them now, though.

John Everett Millais’ Ophelia 1851-2 and Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s The Beloved 1865-6 have been on an international tour over the last year, to the US, Russia, Japan and Italy where they were collectively seen by over 1.1 million people. Ophelia consistently tops the bill as the most looked at art work on the Tate website and the the most popular postcard in the shop.

4. John Everett Millais was a child prodigy.

Growing up in Jersey, Millais was apparently expelled from his nursery aged four. However, his growing talent for drawing was noticed, not only by his mother and drawing master in St Helier, but also by prominent visitors to the island who suggested the young Millais be taken to the Royal Academy Schools in London. The family moved to London when Millias was nine, and by 11 he was admitted to the Royal Academy, as their youngest ever student.

5. They were the first ‘high definition’ painters.

Sir John Everett Millais Detail of Ophelia 1851–2 face

Sir John Everett Millais
Detail of Ophelia 1851–2
Oil on canvas
762 x 1118 mm

© Tate

Detail of forget-me-nots from Ophelia

The pale blue forget-me-nots on the river bank below the purple loosestrife and in the immediate foreground, carry their meaning in their name.

When TV and film began to be filmed in digital HD, it caused a major headache for set dressers and props makers. Film’s forgiving grain and the relatively narrow depth of field, could be relied on to cast a warm glow over a painted backdrop or a hastily-amended costume, and not draw too much attention away from the action. Digital HD, however, suddenly brought absolutely everything in shot into horrifying focus. Truth was in all the tiny details. And so it was for the Pre-Raphaelites. They were accused of using the new technology of photography to paint from, though in fact they did not, always painting form the true natural source, often outdoors. Their paintings do, however, have what Tate curator Alison Smith calls ‘a discordant quality of focus – rather like a high definition film, where the whole depth of field is sharp’. This does make it hard for the eye to read quickly - do you focus on Ophelia’s face, her hands, her dress, the flowers? But it also means that these paintings don’t give up their secrets too easily - they benefit from prolonged looking.

Dante Gabriel Rossetti, 'Beata Beatrix' circa 1864-70

Dante Gabriel Rossetti
Beata Beatrix circa 1864-70
Oil on canvas
support: 864 x 660 mm frame: 1212 x 1015 x 104 mm
Presented by Georgiana, Baroness Mount-Temple in memory of her husband, Francis, Baron Mount-Temple 1889

View the main page for this artwork

6. Lizzie Siddal didn’t die from posing in the bath for Ophelia

Though it probably didn’t do her any favours. Millais had her in the bath from December 1851 until the end of March 1852, and they normally kept the water warm by placing oil lamps placed below. On one occasion, the lamps went out. Millais didn’t notice, and Siddal didn’t mention it. She caught a cold which cost her father £50 (over £3000 today) in doctor’s bills - he sent the bills to Millais. Siddal was in truth, Rossetti’s muse, though she sat for others of the PRB. Their relationship continued over a decade, from the early 1850s to their unhappy marriage in 1860, and to her eventual death (possibly suicide) from an overdose of laudanum, an opium derivative. It was this addiction that killed her, whether by accident or design. Rossetti’s final homage to her, Beata Beatrix, shows a dove bringing Beatrix (Lizzie) a poppy, of course the source of the drug caused her death.

7. Dante Gabriel Rossetti kept a mini zoo at Chelsea.

Rossetti's wombat, seated in his master's lap

Rossetti's Wombat (or woodchuck, more likely)

In 1862 Rossetti moved to 16 Cheyne Walk in Chelsea, a house with a large garden that he turned into a miniature zoo. Rossetti had kangaroos and wallabies, armadillos, a racoon, a Canadian woodchuck and a Japanese salamander, as well as larger animals like a zebu. He even discussed the purchase of an African elephant with the wild animal supplier, Charles Jamrach. His favourite animal however, was a wombat named Top. Rossetti loved visiting the wombats at London Zoo, and had purchased two as pets from Jamrach. Unfortunately Top did not care of the change of scenery, lasting only a couple of months. Rossetti had him stuffed and displayed him in the entrance to the house.

Find out more about the Pre- Raphaelite Brotherhood in our glossary. You can see iconic Pre-Rapahelite works such as Millais’ Ophelia, Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s Beata Beatrix, Ford Madox Brown’s Jesus Washing Peter’s Feet as well as John William Waterhouse’s The Lady of Shalott and other Victorian paintings, for free, every day, at Tate Britain.