Tate Research
Tate
Tate Research
 
BT: Bringing Innovation & Technology Together
Tate PapersCurrent Issue

About

All Papers

ArtistArt theoryArt workConservationMuseologyVisual culture
ART & LANGUAGE On Painting
Art & Language (Michael Baldwin; Mel Ramsden), Index: The Studio at 3 Wesley Place, in the Dark (IV), and Illuminated by an Explosion nearby (VI), 1982,  Tate,  © Art & Language This paper was presented by members of Art & Language (Michael Baldwin, Charles Harrison and Mel Ramsden) at Tate Modern in March 2003 as part of the talks series Painting Present. It argues that painting resists the Institutional Theory of art in as much as it does not depend on institutions for its status as art. In this respect, painting after conceptual art may be seen as just as critical of art institutions as conceptual art used to be.
Spring 2004 View Paper
SEBASTIANO BARASSI Sebastiano Barassi: The Modern Cult of Replicas: A Rieglian Analysis of Values in Replication
© Nina Williams Although it was written over a century ago, Alois Riegl’s ‘The Modern Cult of Monuments’ still provides a valid analytical framework for the study of key theoretical issues surrounding the transmission to the future of works of art. Given their age, some of the broader philosophical principles underlying the text may appear outdated (for example, Riegl’s evolutionism and his theory of Kunstwollen, the notion of art specific to each period in history).
Autumn 2007 View Paper
HARRY COOPER Thoughts on Thoughts on Replication
© Nina Williams As Sebastiano Barassi and Yve-Alain Bois point out in their contributions to this symposium, Alois Riegl’s essay ‘The Modern Cult of Monuments’, 1903, offers a useful set of co-ordinates for thinking about the Tate’s Gabo project, both because Riegl is explicitly addressing the problem of restoration and because, rather than advocating one attitude or another, he offers a taxonomy of possible positions.
Autumn 2007 View Paper
ANNA DEZEUZE Blurring the Boundaries between Art and Life
The Unilever Series: Carsten Höller, Test Site, 2006 (detail). © The artist. Photo: Tate The desire to blur the boundaries between art and life was shared by a great number of artists working across the world in the 1960s. One of the most radical forms to emerge from this shared concern was a type of art that emphasised the lived experience of its viewers by requiring them to adopt new forms of active participation.
Autumn 2007 View Paper
MATTHEW GALE Amazement and Uneasiness: Early Thoughts
The works of Naum Gabo, © Nina Williams Soon after the opening of Tate Modern in 2000, a fragment broke off a work by Naum Gabo, Spiral Theme, 1941, in one of our displays. Though this has yet to unleash terror, it was, as far as I was concerned, a spontaneous and unexpected action certainly raising amazement and unease. However, from talking with colleagues in conservation, it appeared that the various plastics of which the sculpture is composed were pulling against each other, and the most fragile gave way.
Autumn 2007 View Paper
MARGARET IVERSEN Resistance to Replication
© Nina Williams For the past several decades art theorists have been wrestling with the consequences of fine art’s accelerated absorption into technologies of reproduction. Following Walter Benjamin’s qualified embrace of this situation in 1936, some have greeted technical replication as the final deliverance of art from outmoded notions of authorship, originality and uniqueness. The more democratic dissemination possible with photography, film and video positioned them as the contemporary artistic media.
Autumn 2007 View Paper
CHRISTINA LODDER Naum Gabo and the Quandaries of the Replica
© Nina Williams For Naum Gabo, the issue of making replicas, copies, and reconstructions emerged with some force during his lifetime. Like many of the sculptors working in Russia during the revolutionary period, he was sometimes forced to execute his ideas in poor-quality materials, and works frequently became lost or damaged through the upheavals of the time. His colleagues, such as Vladimir Tatlin, who remained in Russia, tended to move into design...
Autumn 2007 View Paper
ALISTAIR RIDER Carl Andre
Carl Andre, Equivalent VIII, 1966. Tate © Carl Andre / VAGA, New York and DACS, London 2008 I am currently in the midst of writing a book on Carl Andre’s poems and sculptures, so when I read through the list of issues the Steering Committee outlined for discussion, my mind immediately turned to the occasions when Andre has chastised museums for installing replicas, or ‘forgeries’ of his works. What light do these episodes throw on the larger debates surrounding replication?
Autumn 2007 View Paper
RICHARD SHIFF Judd through Oldenburg
Donald Judd, Untitled 1971 In his critical writing on Claes Oldenburg during the 1960s Donald Judd explained how emotional content might be conveyed through representational imagery, without the emotion depending on either the identity of the represented object or the subjective mood of the artist. Such art was neither representational, nor abstract, nor expressive in the usual understanding of these general terms. To establish the specificity of his position - through Oldenburg - Judd resorted to catachresis and syllepsis, rhetorical devices that operate where more familiar language fails.
Autumn 2004 View Paper
JEFFREY SALETNIK Josef Albers, Eva Hesse, and the Imperative of Teaching
Josef Albers, Eva Hesse, and the Imperative of Teaching This paper examines affinities between the Bauhaus-indebted instructional methods and practices of Josef Albers and the sculpture of Eva Hesse, his student at Yale University. The author argues that pedagogy affects artistic practice, or that the means or process through which artists are educated contributes to how they approach their work.
Spring 2007 View Paper
LUKE SKREBOWSKI All Systems Go: Recovering Jack Burnham’s ‘Systems Aesthetics’
Detail of: photograph of Jack Burnham (exhibition curator). Reproduced in 'Software Information Technology: Its New Meaning for Art', exhibition catalogue, The Jewish Museum, New York, 1970, p.10. Jack Burnham’s systems aesthetics was one of the first, fully developed, critical theories of postformalist artistic practice. Yet Burnham, undeservedly, is little known today. Recovering, reprising and reassessing his work produces a richer reading of art production c.1970. It also suggests an alternative genealogy of contemporary practice.
Spring 2006 View Paper
back to top back to top
Research
Tate Reasearch
News
Major Projects
Tate Papers
Partnerships
Research Posts
Staff Publications
Research Services
Tate Collection
Tate Learning

Register for email updates

Join the mailing list for
Tate Research.

I have read and agree to the Terms and Conditions.

Contribute to Tate Papers
Emails to the Editor