In 1966 ... I started working entirely in terms of a simple box format. I found that although the box had a strong assertive character, it was highly receptive to the introduction of simple, discrete ideas. The box was also by nature down to earth, utilitarian, familiar, ordinary. It was exactly these characteristics which I wished to examine in terms of real-scale, non-referential objects.
I do not believe that the art object is the symbol of the art idea. It is its embodiment. The relation of idea to object is directly equivalent to the relation of colour, or material, or scale to object. They are all basically formal i.e. internally determined considerations. I feel that the idea achieves or fails to achieve credence and significance from this relation. The idea of itself can be simple, even banal, and yet give rise to provocative form, which in turn raises the significance of the idea.
(Quoted in The Tate Gallery 1968-70, London 1970, p.79.)
Craig-Martin was born in Dublin, Ireland. He moved to the US in 1945, where he was educated, and studied painting at Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut (BA 1961-3 and MA 1964-6). He moved to England in 1966, the year of an exhibition which had a profound influence on him. Primary Structures at the Jewish Museum in Brooklyn, New York was a survey of contemporary British and American sculpture in a style that later became known as Minimalism. Like such Minimalist sculptures as the mirror boxes, Untitled 1965/71 (Tate T01532), by Robert Morris (born 1931), Craig-Martin’s works of the late 1960s were geometric in form and designed to be placed directly on the gallery floor. However, unlike Minimalist sculpture they were intended to be manipulated by the viewer, invoking questions about their formal autonomy and thus their status as objects. Minimalism as a movement was material and process-based and tended towards abstraction. Craig-Martin’s work, by contrast, is based on ordinary, utilitarian objects. The relationship between form (either sculptural or linear) and function has been central to Craig-Martin’s art since this time. He uses the simplified forms of recognisable household elements in order to investigate the visual language underlying the appearance of things. His works question what it is that makes a work of art recognisable as a work of art. This investigation culminated in An Oak Tree 1973 (Tate L02262), in which the Roman Catholic notion of transubstantiation is used to suggest that the element central to defining art is belief. In the boxes Craig-Martin employed a process of reversal to identify ordinary functionality as one element of definition. The operations of opening and closing Half Box (Green) reveal that it has no capacity to contain, thus denying its status as an object of use and defining it instead as an art work. Craig-Martin later commented: ‘art always involves looking at something familiar as though it were unfamiliar. It doesn’t invent anything: everything that art deals with is around.’ (Quoted in Andrew Renton, ‘Michael Craig-Martin: I Feel very Strange When People Call Me A Sculptor’, Flash Art, no.152, May/June 1990, pp.130-3, p.131.)
Michael Craig-Martin: A Retrospective 1968-1989, exhibition catalogue, Whitechapel Gallery, London 1989
Michael Craig-Martin: Selected Works 1966-1975, exhibition catalogue, Arnolfini Gallery, Bristol, Institute of Contemporary Art, London and Turnpike Gallery, Leigh 1976
1965 to 1972 – When Attitudes Became Form, exhibition catalogue, Kettle’s Yard Cambridge and Fruitmarket Gallery, Edinburgh 1984, p.37, reproduced p.37