
In Tate Britain
- Artist
- Sir William Beechey 1753–1839
- Medium
- Oil paint on canvas
- Dimensions
- Unconfirmed: 1805 × 1500 mm
- Collection
- Tate
- Acquisition
- Purchased with assistance from the Art Fund 1993
- Reference
- T06734
Summary
This large oil painting shows two fashionably-dressed children in a countryside setting encountering an older boy, who is dressed in ragged clothes and visibly in distress. The well-dressed girl leans forward to pass the boy a coin, while a dog (a well-groomed spaniel presumably belonging to the wealthy children) looks up. Such emotive scenes of rural poverty and philanthropic kindness were a feature of British art in the latter third of the eighteenth century. A succession of paintings on such themes was exhibited at public displays over these years, and numerous prints were issued reproducing these compositions or similar scenes. They were designed to appeal to the current fashion for ‘sentiment’, heightened feelings of sympathy and pity, apparent in poetry, novels and essays as well as the visual arts. However, this painting is unusual in that the children are represented life-size, painted on a large canvas that would normally be reserved for full-length (adult) portraits or history paintings.
The painter, Sir William Beechey, was primarily a portrait artist and was highly successful, working in London from 1787 after a period in Norwich. His work from this later period of his career was almost always on this large scale and is characterised by the fluent application of paint and vivid colours. Although first exhibited by the artist only as ‘Portrait of Children relieving a Beggar Boy’ the identity of the two rich children was noted by the connoisseur Horace Walpole in a handwritten annotation to his copy of the Royal Academy’s catalogue: ‘Sir J Forde’s children’. The sitters are two children of Sir Francis Ford (1758–1801) of Ember Court, Thames Ditton, Surrey and Lears, Barbados, a wealthy plantation owner and politician. Based on the apparent ages of the children they can probably be identified as Francis Ford (1787–1839), later 2nd Baronet, and Mary Ford (died 1872).
Ford was born in Barbados and was of the fourth generation of Fords to be plantation owners in Barbados. Although he was educated and lived in England, he owned extensive property in the West Indies and upheld a strong pro-slavery stance in his activities as a Member of Parliament. The children represented in this picture were direct beneficiaries of the wealth made through enslaved labour. Ford’s will, of 27 January 1800, promised his wife £700 per year, £5,000 for each child, and ‘All my lands and slaves for my eldest son Francis Ford at 21’ (quoted in ‘Ford of Barbados, with Pedigrees’, Caribbeana, vol.3, 1913–14, p.372). The relevance of these economic links to slavery to this painting are open to interpretation. However, the pro-slavery lobby often claimed that the quality of life that the plantation owners provided for enslaved people in the West Indies was better than that enjoyed by working people in England. The unusual emphasis given in this picture to the abject poverty and desperation of the beggar boy might, then, be giving visual form to the familiar pro-slavery sentiment concerning poverty.
Further reading
Martin Postle, Angels and Urchins: The Fancy Picture in 18th Century British Art, exhibition catalogue, Djangoly Art Gallery, Nottingham 1998, pp.93–4.
Mirjam Neumeister (ed.), The Changing Face of Childhood: British Children's Portraits and their Influence in Europe, exhibition catalogue, Dulwich Picture Gallery, London 2007, pp.20–1
Martin Myrone
September 2013
Does this text contain inaccurate information or language that you feel we should improve or change? We would like to hear from you.
Display caption
William Beechey exhibited this painting in 1793. |t shows Mary and Francis, the children of Sir Francis Ford, a wealthy politician and Barbadian plantation owner. This sentimental scene was perhaps a response to growing concerns about poverty in Britain, showing landowning families like the Fords in a benevolent light. But in 1793 Ford also spoke in parliament in favour of ‘procrastinating’ the abolition of the slave trade. The unusually stark portrayal of the beggar boy’s distress may allude to the pro-slavery claim that enslaved people in the Caribbean had better lives than British people living in poverty.
Gallery label, April 2023
Does this text contain inaccurate information or language that you feel we should improve or change? We would like to hear from you.
Explore
- emotions, concepts and ideas(16,416)
-
- emotions and human qualities(5,345)
-
- compassion(47)
- clothing and personal items(5,879)
-
- hat(1,437)
- actions: postures and motions(9,111)
-
- arm / arms raised(839)
- disability(51)
- groups(310)
- health and welfare(696)
You might like
-
Sir Thomas Lawrence Miss Laura Dorothea Ross (Mrs Francis Robertson)
c.1798–1804 -
Thomas Gainsborough The Baillie Family
c.1784 -
Sir William Beechey James P. Johnstone
date not known -
Sir William Beechey Alexander P. Johnstone
c.1790–5 -
Thomas Stothard Lord William Russell Taking Leave of his Children
date not known -
Francis Wheatley A Family Group in a Landscape
c.1775 -
Manner of Sir Joshua Reynolds Portrait of a Man, probably Francis Barber
date not known -
Thomas Gainsborough Sir Francis Gregg
c.1770 -
John Constable The Bridges Family
1804 -
Ramsay Richard Reinagle A Boy Reading
c.1795 -
Hugh Barron The Children of George Bond of Ditchleys
1768 -
Charles Gill The Lethbridge Children
1785 -
Samuel Woodforde The Bennett Family
exhibited 1803 -
Benjamin Marshall Sir Charles Bunbury with Cox, his Trainer, and a Stable-Lad: A Study for ‘Surprise and Eleanor’
?1801 -
Benjamin Marshall James Belcher, Bare-Knuckle Champion of England
?1803