David Bomberg

The Mud Bath

1914

Not on display

Artist: David Bomberg 1890–1957
Medium: Oil paint on canvas
Dimensions: Support: 1524 x 2242 mm
frame: 1718 x 2427 x 70 mm
Collection: Tate
Acquisition: Purchased 1964
Reference: T00656

Display caption

The way in which Bomberg reduces the human figure to a series of geometric shapes may reflect his fascination with the machine age, which he shared with the Futurists and Vorticists. This painting could also represent the human form, stripped to its essential core.The scene is based on steam baths near Bomberg’s home in east London, which were used by the local Jewish population and which also had religious associations. They were, perhaps, a place for both physical and spiritual cleansing.

Gallery label, July 2007

Does this text contain inaccurate information or language that you feel we should improve or change? We would like to hear from you.

Catalogue entry

David Bomberg 1890–1957

T00656 The Mud Bath 1914

Inscr. ‘No. 1 Mud-Bath David Bomberg’ on back of canvas (before relining).
Canvas, 60 x 88¼ (152 x 224).
Purchased from the artist’s widow through Marlborough Fine Art Ltd. (Grant-in-Aid) 1964.
Exh: Chenil Gallery, July 1914; Coventry, September 1960; Marlborough Fine Art Ltd., March 1964 (3, repr. in colour).
Lit: Max Wykes-Joyce in Arts Review, XVI, No. 6, 1964, p. 5, repr. p. 4 (in colour).

When ‘The Mud Bath’ was first exhibited at the Chenil Gallery, it was ‘hung outside the Gallery premises that it may have every advantage of lighting and space’. Two preparatory works, ‘Study for mud bath’ (T01963) and ‘Mud bathers’, were also included. In the Foreword the artist wrote: ‘I appeal to a Sense of Form. In some of the works I show in the first room, I completely abandon Naturalism and Tradition. I am Searching for an Intenser expression. In other work in this room, where I use Naturalistic Form, I have stripped it of all irrelevant matter.

‘I look upon Nature, while I live in a steel city, where decoration happens, it is accidental. My object is the construction of Pure Form.’ A study for ‘The Mud Bath’ was also in the Marlborough Fine Art exhibition, 1964 (2, repr.).

Mrs. Lilian Bomberg told the compiler that she had heard that a mud bath had in fact been opened by a Russian in the East End of London about the time the picture was painted. The Jewish Chronicle of 5 June 1964 confirmed that this was Schevzilk’s steam baths in Brick Lane, which were destroyed by fire in the last war.

Published in The Tate Gallery Report 1964–1965, London 1966.