Not on display
The picture depicts the meeting of the Trojan prince Aeneas and the Carthaginian queen, Dido, as described in Book I of Virgil's Aeneid. Following the sack of Troy, Aeneas and his followers are shipwrecked on the coast of North Africa, near the city of Carthage. There, Aeneas meets his mother, Venus, disguised as a huntress. She tells him the sad history of Dido, who was forced to flee her home in Tyre and to build a new citadel at Carthage. Venus envelops Aeneas and his compatriot Achates in a shroud of mist to enable them to penetrate Dido's citadel undetected. Upon entering the temple of Juno, Aeneas sees Dido seated upon her throne, welcoming a number of his fellow Trojans whom he had believed drowned in the recent shipwreck, and expressing her desire to see their 'king' Aeneas. At that moment the mist clears and Aeneas reveals his identity to Dido. This is the precise moment portrayed by Dance.
Nathaniel Dance travelled to Italy in 1754 and in 1759 began work on his first major classical subject, The Death of Virginia (untraced), possibly the first history painting derived from a classical text to have been made by a British artist working in Rome. The present picture was commissioned probably in 1763-4, by George Harry, Lord Grey of Groby (1737-1819), who also commissioned landscapes by the Irish artist, John Plimmer (flourished 1755-1760-1), a self-portrait by Anton Raphael Mengs (1728-79), as well as two satirical works by Thomas Patch (1725-82).
The only specific reference to the making of this picture is the Grand Tour diary of James Martin (1738-1810) who, on 10 July 1764, noted that he had seen in Dance's studio 'several portraits by Him & a History Piece begun represg. Eneas appearing to Dido; It appeared to me to be well composed'. On 2 November 1764 he wrote: 'wt to Mr Dance's saw there a picture he has almost finished for Lord Gray representing Aeneas appearing to Dido. I think it has great merit for the Variety, Expression & attitudes of the Figures; they seem to me about a third as tall as Life' (transcription from the original manuscript in the Brinsley Ford Archive, Paul Mellon Centre, London). Dance's composition, with its severely Neoclassical style, is reminiscent of the work of Nicolas Poussin (1594-1665), the figures depicted in a frieze-like manner across the picture plane, which is itself carefully modulated by the supporting architectural framework.
Dance exhibited The Meeting of Dido and Aeneas at the Society of Artists in 1766, the painting presumably heralding his return to Britain. The following year his Royal commission, Timon of Athens, was also exhibited there. Dance exhibited further classical subjects at the Royal Academy, although his mainstay continued to be portraits. A man of independent means, Dance all but retired as a professional artist in the later 1770s. He resigned from the Royal Academy in 1790, on becoming a Member of Parliament. His wealth was further increased by marriage to a rich widow. In 1800 Dance changed his surname to 'Dance-Holland' by Royal license, Holland being the surname of a distant cousin of his wife.
David Goodreau, Nathaniel Dance, exhibition catalogue, The Iveagh Bequest, Kenwood, London 1977 p.10
John Ingamells, A Dictionary of British and Irish Travellers in Italy 1701-1800 compiled from the Brinsley Ford Archive, New Haven and London 1997, pp.275 and 431
Does this text contain inaccurate information or language that you feel we should improve or change? We would like to hear from you.
Technique and condition
Nathaniel Dance-Holland’s The Meeting of Dido and Aeneas was exhibited in 1766. The support is a coarse loosely woven, linen canvas primed with a brownish pink ground, which is smooth except where it has formed lumpy reticulations between the canvas threads (for example near the back of Aeneas's head). This type of canvas and ground is typical of paintings prepared in Rome in the mid-eighteenth century.
The composition seems to have been sketched in first with dull brown oil paint or perhaps dark grey in the background, applied very thinly. Thereafter the paint was dense and oily, with the modelling done largely wet-in-wet, sketchily in the background and more enamel-like in the foreground.
The artist appears to have made many alterations, the thickness and density of the lower layers suggest changes of mind rather than an unusual form of underpainting. Those in the background faces are now visible to the naked eye and it is also clear that the brown toga at the far right was originally green, parts of this layer being left visible to create a shot effect. Microscopic examination of the surface revealed other alteration, mainly made to the colour scheme. For example; Aeneas's toga was originally purple, Dido's purple bodice was once pale lemon yellow, as was her blue sleeve and Dido’s yellow skirt was once purple.
In general the painting is in excellent condition. There has been later abrasion of the paint in some dark and mid-tones but it does not significantly diminish the image. It was lined sometime in the nineteenth century and given a new stretcher at the same time.