Alan Davie

Birth of Venus

1955

© Estate of Alan Davie

License this image

Not on display

Artist: Alan Davie 1920–2014
Medium: Oil paint on board
Dimensions: Support: 1600 x 2438 mm
frame: 1608 x 2453 x 38 mm
Collection: Tate
Acquisition: Purchased 1958
Reference: T00203

Display caption

Davie’s approach to painting has always been improvisatory (he is also a jazz musician) and he insists the titles are only invented after the work is complete. So he arrived at this title because he saw in the image ‘a distinct suggestion of the primeval womb, birth place, cavern, source of fruitfulness and love’. His approach and the imagery he found both reflect a widespread interest at the time in myth and the symbolic representation in many cultures of such fundamental processes as birth, procreation and death.

Gallery label, February 2010

Does this text contain inaccurate information or language that you feel we should improve or change? We would like to hear from you.

Catalogue entry

T00203 BIRTH OF VENUS 1955

Inscr. on back ‘Alan Davie Birth of Venus 1955’.
Oil on hardboard, 63×96 (160×244).

Purchased from the Whitechapel Art Gallery (Grant-in-Aid) 1958.

Exh: Wakefield, March 1958 (40); Nottingham University, April–May 1958 (30); Whitechapel Art Gallery, June–August 1958 (41, repr. pl.7); Liverpool, September–October 1958 (38).

The artist wrote (9 August 1958): '... I must make it clear that the titles of my pictures are not meant to be taken literally but are in fact my own poetic interpretation of the work, thought up usually after the work is complete.

'... The “Birth of Venus” has in its vague evocation a distinct suggestion of the primeval womb, birth place, cavern, source of fruitfulness and love - all ideas which did not suggest themselves to me when I was working.... But later, the title suggested itself, as associations presented themselves to me - and more than a static image seemed to be there - but truly an image of emergence, of becoming fruitful - of birth - the birth of Venus....

‘... Although every work of mine must inevitably bear the stamp of my own personality - I feel that each one must, to be satisfactory, be a new revelation of something hitherto unknown to me and I consider this evocation of the unknown to be the true function of any art.’

Published in:
Mary Chamot, Dennis Farr and Martin Butlin, The Modern British Paintings, Drawings and Sculpture, London 1964, I