
In Tate Modern
- Artist
- Sonia Delaunay 1885–1979
- Original title
- Triptyque
- Medium
- Oil paint on canvas
- Dimensions
- Support: 997 × 2000 mm
frame: 1065 × 2062 × 85 mm - Collection
- Tate
- Acquisition
- Purchased 1966
- Reference
- T00817
Summary
Triptych is a large oil painting on canvas by Ukrainian-born French artist Sonia Delaunay. Its composition comprises a series of abstract shapes, including circles, semi-circles, squares, triangles and rectangles. The painting is loosely divided into the three sections indicated in its title, Triptych. Of these, the centre is dominated by three large disks while the left and right sides are filled with part-circles, triangles and squares. The three sections are broadly marked out by a diagonal line running from the lower right corner to the upper centre and a broken vertical line formed by the arrangement of squares in the upper left corner which continues to the lower edge. A vivid palette of reds, blues, blacks, white, green, grey and orange has been used. This palette, combined with the diverse and often fractured geometric forms, gives the painting a lively appearance. The viewer’s eye is continually drawn to the centre of the image by the lighter areas of yellow ochre, light green, orange and white that delineate the central disks. The work is signed in white paint in the lower left corner.
Delaunay created Triptych in April and May 1963, most likely in her studio at 16 rue Saint-Simon, Paris, to which she moved in 1935 and in which she lived until her death in 1979. She characteristically painted onto the surface of her canvases without prior underdrawing, as is case with Triptych. The oil paint has been boldly applied with a brush and palette knife in clear blocks of colour. Different techniques have been incorporated, such as scumbling and scraping down, and the white primer can be glimpsed in areas such as around the red semi-circle in the lower right corner. The surface is largely matte, especially in the black, blue and green areas, although the white and ochre elements are glossy in appearance.
In 1966 Delaunay explained that she called this work Triptych ‘because I composed it starting from three different motifs I have been working on for some years. The left-hand part is a motif I have worked on since 1960. The right-hand one is more recent’ (quoted in Ronald Alley, Catalogue of the Tate Gallery’s Collection of Modern Art other than Works by British Artists, London 1981, p.164). The triangles, curved shapes and rectangles are characteristic of her work in this period. However, Triptych also marked a turning point. In 1966 Delaunay wrote: ‘this is a painting on which I worked a great deal and which opened up new vistas for me. I have freed myself from many plastic problems. I now intend to continue in this direction with all my lyricism, while retaining the precision of construction’ (quoted in Alley 1981, p.164). She elaborated: ‘I set myself the problem of introducing an area of white in the centre. It was very difficult to create a unity between the two parts’ (quoted in Alley 1981, p.164). The difficulty Delaunay had in making Triptych is suggested by a photograph published in 1965 in the journal Aujourd’hui which shows the painting in progress and indicates that some reworking was undertaken, particularly in the central composition (see Aujourd’hui, no.48, 1965, p.84).
According to the art historians Stanley Baron with Jacques Damase, Delaunay’s aim ‘was not to reduce abstract art to an intellectual preference. For her, the abstract and the sensuous had to “marry”’ (Baron and Damase 1995, p.49). When asked in 1978 if she attributed any kind of cosmic significance to geometric shapes, Delaunay claimed: ‘no. Too abstract. No, no, no. I’m too earthy’ (quoted in Seidner and Delaunay 1982, p.66). Triptych sees the emergence of a dark palette following her husband Robert’s death in 1941, as the artist Jennifer Durant has observed: ‘a remarkable cacophony of gongs or solemn, chiming bells. Harshened vermilion, and richly darkened – and also lightened – viridian, make sonorous tones against the blacks’ (Jennifer Durant, ‘Jennifer Durant RA on the Richness of Sonia Delaunay’s Life and Art’, RA Magazine, Spring 2015, https://www.royalacademy.org.uk/article/jennifer-durrant-on-sonia-delaunay, accessed 15 May 2016).
The varied forms and layered picture planes demonstrate Delaunay’s interest in the colour theories of Marcel Eugène Chevreul (1786–1889), whose findings on the relationships of simultaneous colour led Sonia and Robert Delaunay to found a new style based on earlier cubist work. This style was called simultanism and was later rechristened orphism by the poet Guillaume Apollinaire. Triptych is a key painting from Delaunay’s later career, when she was firmly established as one of the pioneers of abstraction. In 1964 she had a retrospective at the Louvre, Paris – the first held in that museum for a living female artist – and she was at the forefront of avant-garde debates in Paris. Her work shows the influence of (and itself influenced) Robert Delaunay, as well as close associates such as Piet Mondrian, Jean Arp and Sophie Taeuber-Arp.
Further reading
David Seidner and Sonia Delaunay, ‘Sonia Delaunay’, Bomb, vol.1, no.2, 1982, pp.18–20, 66.
Stanley Baron with Jacques Damase, Sonia Delaunay: The Life of an Artist, New York 1995.
Anne Montfort and Cécile Godefroy, Sonia Delaunay, exhibition catalogue, Tate Modern, London 2015, reproduced pp.240–1.
Jo Kear
May 2016
Supported by Christie’s.
Does this text contain inaccurate information or language that you feel we should improve or change? We would like to hear from you.
Display caption
A pioneer of abstraction and an innovator in the fields of fashion, interior decoration, architecture and advertising, Sonia Delaunay’s career spanned much of the twentieth century. Her early abstract paintings attempted to capture the dynamism of the modern city and she continued to experiment with abstraction throughout her life. In Triptych, made in her late seventies, she set herself the challenge of introducing a white area in the centre of the work, making it more difficult to create a unity between the three sections. She wrote this work ‘opened up new vistas for me’.
Gallery label, February 2016
Does this text contain inaccurate information or language that you feel we should improve or change? We would like to hear from you.
Catalogue entry
Sonia Delaunay 1885-1979
T00817 Triptyque
(Triptych) 1963
Inscribed 'SONIA DELAUNAY 63' b.l., 'SONIA DELAUNAY' on stretcher and '1052' on back on canvas
Oil on canvas, 39 1/4 x 78 3/4 (100 x 200)
Purchased from the artist through Gimpel Fils (Mara Savic Bequest) 1966
Exh:
Jean Arp, Sonia Delaunay, Serge Poliakoff, Musée Rath, Geneva, April-May 1964 (48); Sonia Delaunay, Galerie Bing, Paris, November-December 1964 (works not numbered); Sonia Delaunay, Galerie Schütze, Bad Godesberg, May-June 1965 (works not numbered); Sonia Delaunay, Haus am Lützowplatz, Berlin, July 1965 (7); Sonia Delaunay, Gimpel & Hanover Galerie, Zurich, October 1965 (12); Gimpel Fils, London, February 1966 (12); Rétrospective Sonia Delaunay, Musée National d'Art Moderne, Paris, November 1967-January 1968 (179)
Repr:
Aujourd'hui, No.48, 1965, p.84 (earlier state); XXe Siécle, No.29, 1967, p.109 (reproduction trimmed at the bottom and on the right); Jacques Damase, Sonia Delaunay and others, Sonia Delaunay: Rythmes et Couleurs
(Paris 1971), pp.336-7 in colour
The artist wrote (17 March 1966): 'This is a painting on which I worked a great deal and which opened up new vistas for me. I have freed myself from many plastic problems. I now intend to continue this direction with all my lyricism, while retaining the precision of construction.'
In a later letter (11 May 1966), she added: '"Triptych" was painted in April-May 1963 and finished in the autumn. I gave it this title because I composed it starting from three different motifs I have been working with for some years.
'The left-hand part is a motif I have worked on since 1960. The right-hand one is more recent.
'I set myself the problem of introducing an area of white in the centre. It was very difficult to create a unity between the three parts.'
The photograph reproduced in Aujourd'hui, 1965, shows an earlier state of this composition, with a larger expanse of white. There was also a dark V-shaped line in the centre extending from the corner of the white area in the lower right to the bottom of the brownish half-circle above, and thence right and upwards to the tip of what is now a green triangle.
Published in:
Ronald Alley, Catalogue of the Tate Gallery's Collection of Modern Art other than Works by British Artists, Tate Gallery and Sotheby Parke-Bernet, London 1981, p.164, reproduced p.164
Features
-
MicroTate 8
Francis Wells on Luke Fildes’s The Doctor 1891, Alexa de Ferranti on William Hogarth’s The Painter and his Pug 1745, …
Explore
- abstraction(9,882)
-
- non-representational(6,712)
You might like
-
Serge Poliakoff Abstract Composition
1954 -
Victor Vasarely Supernovae
1959–61 -
Victor Vasarely Nives II
1949–58 -
Gillian Wise Looped Network Suspended in Pictorial Space
1974 -
Yves Tanguy The Invisibles
1951 -
Robert Helman Candile
1955 -
Jean Hélion Ile de France
1935 -
Robert Delaunay Endless Rhythm
1934 -
Jean Dubuffet Site Inhabited by Objects
1965 -
Jean Hélion Abstract Composition
1934 -
Stanley William Hayter Untitled
1946 -
André Fougeron Return from the Market
1953 -
Victor Vasarely Banya
1964 -
André Masson Star, Winged Being, Fish
1955 -
Hans Hofmann Pompeii
1959