Salvador Dalí

Metamorphosis of Narcissus


Not on display

Salvador Dalí 1904–1989
Original title
Métamorphose de Narcisse
Oil paint on canvas
Support: 511 × 781 mm
frame: 820 × 1092 × 85 mm
Purchased 1979


This painting is Dalí's interpretation of the Greek myth of Narcissus. Narcissus was a youth of great beauty who loved only himself and broke the hearts of many lovers. The gods punished him by letting him see his own reflection in a pool. He fell in love with it, but discovered he could not embrace it and died of frustration. Relenting, the gods immortalised him as the narcissus (daffodil) flower. For this picture Dalí used a meticulous technique which he described as 'hand-painted colour photography' to depict with hallucinatory effect the transformation of Narcissus, kneeling in the pool, into the hand holding the egg and flower. Narcissus as he was before his transformation is seen posing in the background. The play with 'double images' sprang from Dalí's fascination with hallucination and delusion.

This was Dalí's first painting to be made entirely in accordance with the paranoiac critical method, which the artist described as a 'Spontaneous method of irrational knowledge, based on the critical-interpretative association of the phenomena of delirium' (The Conquest of the Irrational, published in The Secret Life of Salvador Dalí, New York 1942). Robert Descharnes noted that this painting meant a great deal to Dalí, as it was the first Surrealist work to offer a consistent interpretation of an irrational subject.

The artist said to Descharnes of this picture:

A painting shown and explained to Dr. Freud.

Pedagogical presentation of the myth of narcissism, illustrated by a poem written at the same time.
In this poem and this painting, there is death and fossilization of Narcissus.

The poem to which Dalí referred was published in 1937, in a small book by the artist entitled Metamorphosis of Narcissus. The book also contains two explanatory notes printed facing a colour reproduction of the painting, the first of which reads:

If one looks for some time, from a slight distance and with a certain 'distant fixedness', at the hypnotically immobile figure of Narcissus, it gradually disappears until at last it is completely invisible.

The metamorphosis of the myth takes place at that precise moment, for the image of Narcissus is suddenly transformed into the image of a hand which rises out of his own reflection. At the tips of its fingers the hand is holding an egg, a seed, a bulb from which will be born the new narcissus - the flower. Beside it can be seen the limestone sculpture of the hand - the fossil hand of the water holding the blown flower.

When he met Sigmund Freud in London in 1938, Dalí took this picture with him as an example of his work, as well as a magazine containing an article he had written on paranoia. Freud wrote the following day to Stefan Zweig, who had introduced them, that 'it would be very interesting to explore analytically the growth of a picture like this'.

Further reading:
Tate Gallery 1978-80 Illustrated Catalogue of Acquisitions, London 1981, pp.85-9, reproduced p.85
Robert Descharnes, Gilles Néret, Salvador Dalí: The Paintings, 2 volumes, Köln 1994, pp.288-9, 299, 757, reproduced pl.645 in colour
Dawn Ades, Dalí, revised edition, London 1995, pp.132-3, reproduced p.131 in colour

Terry Riggs
March 1998

Does this text contain inaccurate information or language that you feel we should improve or change? We would like to hear from you.

Display caption

According to Greek mythology, Narcissus fell in love with his own reflection in a pool. Unable to embrace the watery image, he pined away, and the gods immortalised him as a flower. Dalí shows this metamorphosis by doubling a crouching figure by the lake with a hand clutching an egg, from which the narcissus flower sprouts. When this painting was first exhibited it was accompanied by a long poem by Dalí. Together, the words and image suggest a range of emotions triggered by the theme of metamorphosis, including anxiety, disgust and desire.

Gallery label, October 2016

Does this text contain inaccurate information or language that you feel we should improve or change? We would like to hear from you.

Catalogue entry

Salvador Dalí 1904–1989

Metamorphosis of Narcissus
Métamorphose de Narcisse
Oil paint on canvas
510 x 780 mm
Inscribed ‘Gala Salvador Dalí 1937’ lower right
Purchased from the Edward James Foundation (Grant-in-Aid) 1979

Ownership history:
Purchased from the artist by Edward James, Chichester 1937; Edward James Foundation on loan to Tate from 1958 until acquired in 1979.

Exhibition history:

Salvador Dalí, Galerie Renou et Colle, Paris, 6–30 July 1937, no number.
The 1937 International Exhibition of Paintings, Carnegie Institute, Pittsburgh, October–December 1937, no.278.
Salvador Dalí, Tokyo Prince Hotel Gallery, Tokyo, 8 September–18 October 1964; Nagoya Prefectural Museum of Art, Nagoya, 23–30 October 1964; Kyoto Municipal Art Gallery, Kyoto, 3–29 November 1964, no.135.
Salvador Dalí 1910–1965, Gallery of Modern Art, New York, December 1965–September 1966, no.77.
Dalí, Museum Boymans van Beuningen, Rotterdam, 21 November 1970–10 January 1971, no.55.
Salvador Dalí, Staatliche Kunsthalle, Baden-Baden, 29 January–18 April 1971, no.48.
Dalí: Art-in-Jewels Exhibition and Paintings, Whitechapel Art Gallery, June–July 1971, no.13.
Dada and Surrealism Reviewed, Hayward Gallery, January–March 1978, no.12.42.
Salvador Dalí: Rétrospective 1920–1980, Musée national d’art moderne, Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris, 18 December 1979–21 April 1980, no.218.
Salvador Dalí, Tate Gallery, London, 14 May–29 June 1980, no.156.
Picasso/Miró/Dalí: Évocations d’Espagne, Palais des Beaux-Arts, Charleroi, 26 September–22 December 1985, no.25.
Salvador Dalí: 1904–1989, Staatsgalerie, Stuttgart, 13 May–23 July 1989; Kunsthaus, Zürich, 18 August–22 October 1989, no.191.
Salvador Dalí: A Mythology, Tate Gallery Liverpool, 24 October 1998–31 January 1999; Salvador Dalí Museum, St. Petersburg, Florida, 5 March–24 May 1999, no.33.
Surrealism: The Untamed Eye, Norwich Castle Museum, July–November 1999, catalogue no.8, reproduced in colour, p.14.
Surrealism, Desire Unbound, Tate Modern, London, 20 September 2001–1 January 2002; The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 6 February–12 May 2002, no.288.
Dalí, Palazzo Grassi, Venice, 12 September 2004–16 January 2005; Philadelphia Museum of Art, 16 February–15 May 2005, no.167.
Dalí & Film, Tate Modern, London, 1 June–9 September 2007; Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 14 October 2007–6 January 2008; The Salvador Dalí Museum, St Petersburg, Florida, 1 February–1 June 2008; Museum of Modern Art, New York, 29 June–15 September 2008, no.95.      
Dalí Dalí featuring Francesco Vezzoli, Moderna Museet, Stockholm, 19 September 2009–17 January 2010, no.24.
Salvador Dalí, Métamorphose de Narcisse, Paris and New York 1937, n.p.
Salvador Dalí, The Secret Life of Salvador Dalí, New York 1942, p.VI (detail).
A. Reynolds Morse, with introduction by Michel Tapié, Dalí, A Study of his Life and Work, New York 1958, pp.48, 55.
Fleur Cowles, The Case of Salvador Dalí, London 1959, pp.289–94.
Robert Descharnes, Dalí de Gala, Lausanne 1962, p.166.
V. Zykmund, Surrealismus. Vydavatel ‘stro Slovenského fondu vytvarnych umeni, Bratislava 1964, no.10.
Max Gérard, Dalí de Draeger, Paris 1968, pl.201.
Robert Lebel, ‘Le Dalí de tout le monde ou la psychopathologie commercialisée’, L’Oeil, no.169, January 1969, pp.30–1.
Roger Cardinal and Robert Short, Surrealism: Permanent Revelation, Worthing 1970, p.97.
William Gaunt, The Surrealists, London 1972, pp.164–5.
Robert Descharnes, Salvador Dalí, Paris 1973, p.33.
David Larkin (ed.), with introduction by J.G. Ballard, Dalí, Paris 1973, pp.65–8.
Max Gérard, Dalí … Dalí … Dalí …, Paris 1974, pp.96–7.
T. Ogura and Robert Descharnes, L´Art moderne du monde, Tokyo 1974, fig.39, p.111.
Simon Wilson, Surrealist Painting, London 1975, p.13, pl.32.
Robert Descharnes and S. Terayama, Dalí: The Book of Great Masters, Tokyo 1978, fig.34.
Conroy Maddox, Dalí, New York 1979, pp.54–5.
M. Brion, ‘Dalí-Magus’, in Hommage à Dalí, Paris 1980, p.11.
Josep Pla, with introduction by Salvador Dalí, Obres de museu, Figueres 1981, p.103.
Dawn Ades, Dalí, London 1995, pp.131–3.
Ignacio Gómez de Liaño, Dalí, Barcelona 1982, p.85.
Dalí i els llibres, Barcelona 1982, exhibition catalogue, p.31.
Robert Descharnes, Dalí, l’oeuvre et l’homme, Lausanne 1984, p.215.
Milly Heyd, ‘Dalí’s Metamorphosis of Narcissus Reconsidered’, Artibus et Historiae, vol.5, no.10, 1984, pp.121–31.
Rafael Santos Torroella, La Miel es más dulce que la sangre: Las Épocas lorquiana y freudiana de Salvador Dalí, Barcelona 1984, p.163.
R. Rom, Salvador Dalí, The Surrealistic Angel, San Francisco 1985, pp.142–3.
Augustín Sánchez Vidal, Buñuel, Lorca y Dalí: El enigma sin fin, Barcelona 1988, p.271.
Ralf Schiebler Salvador Dalí, Mesiterwerke der dreissiger Jahre, Munich 1989, fig.27.
Entender la pintura: Dalí, Barcelona 1989, p.20.
A.B. Tello, Salvador Dalí, Barcelona 1990, p.71.
Paul Moorhouse, Dalí, Wigston 1990, reproduced on dust jacket.
L. Azcue Brea, Salvador Dalí, Salamanca 1990, p.49.
Karen von Maur, ‘De Eros al cosmos’, in Los Dalís de Dalí, exhibition catalogue, Centro cultural/Arte contemporaneo, Mexico City, Mexico 1990, p.25.
E. Shanes, Dalí, Madrid 1991, p.85.
Luis Romero, PsicoDálico, Barcelona 1991, p.94.
Dalí Vision, Barcelona 1992, p.31.
André Bouguenec, Salvador Dalí, Philosophe et Esotériste incompris, Nantes 1993, pp.39–40.
Robert Descharnes and Gilles Néret, Salvador Dalí, 1904–1989. L’Oeuvre peint, Cologne 1993, p.289.
A. Reynolds Morse, Dalí's Animal Crackers, St. Petersburg, Florida Salvador Dalí Museum 1993, p.73.
Meredith Etherington-Smith, The Persistence of Memory: A Biography of Dalí, New York 1993, pp.221–3.
M. Venezia, Salvador Dalí, Chicago 1993, pp.6-7.
J. Brihuega, Miró y Dalí: Los grandes surrealistas, Madrid 1993, p.69.
Marco Di Capua, Dalí, New York 1994, p.195.
Jessica Hodge, Dalí, London 1994, pp.86–7.
Salvador Dalí, Barcelona 1994, reproduced on front cover, fig.22.
Haim Finkelstein, Salvador Dalí’s Art and Writing, 1927–1942: The Metamorphosis of Narcissus, Cambridge 1996, p.230.
Robert Radford, Dalí, London 1997, pp.177, 180–1, 183.
Ian Gibson, The Shameful Life of Salvador Dalí, London 1997, fig.28.
Nicola Coleby (ed.), A Surreal Life: Edward James, 1907–1984 exhibition catalogue, Brighton Museum and Art Gallery 1998, p.54.
David Lomas, ‘The Metamorphosis of Narcissus: Dalí’s Self-Analysis’, in Dawn Ades and Fiona Bradley, Salvador Dalí, A Mythology, London 1998, pp.78–100.
R. Goff, Salvador Dalí, Paris 1998, pp.74–5.
The Universe of Salvador Dalí, exhibition catalogue, Yamanashi Prefectural Museum 1999, pp.20, 125.
Dalí Exhibition 1999, exhibition catalogue, Mitsukoshi Museum of Art, Tokyo 1999, p.22.
Augustín Sanchez Vidal, Salvador Dalí, Madrid 1999, p.47.
David Lomas, The Haunted Self, New Haven 2000, pp.171–86.
Grandes maestros de la pintura, Barcelona 2001, pp.22–4.
A.M. Perrone, Salvador Dalí, escándalo, transgression y genio, Buenos Aires 2001, p.120.
Juan Antonio Ramírez, Dalí: Lo crudo y lo podrido, Madrid 2002, p.31.
H. Kliczkowski Asppan, Gaudí-Dalí, Madrid 2002, p.86–7.
E. de Diego, Querida Gala: Las vidas ocultas de Gala y Dalí, Madrid 2003, p.161.
Ricard Mas Peinado, Universo Dalí, Barcelona & Madrid 2003, p.141.
Robert Hughes, Les Essentiels de l’art Dalí, Amsterdam 2003, pp.202–3.
Dalí 1904–2004, Barcelona 2003, pp.108–9.
L. Llongueras, Todo Dalí: Vida y obra del personaje más genial y espectacular del siglo XX, Barcelona 2003, p.LXVI.
Salvador Dalí, Obra completa. Textos autobiográficos, vol.1, Barcelona 2003, n.p.
Stephan Andreae and Jean-Hubert Martin, The Endless Enigma: Dalí and the Magicians of Multiple Meaning, exhibition catalogue, Museum Kunst Palast, Düsseldorf 2003, p.189.
David Lomas, ‘“Se consume de amor por sus propios ojos”: Dalí, Narciso y la imagen de simulacro’, in Dalí, Un creador dissident, Barcelona 2004, pp.242–67.
Jean-Louis Gaillemin, Dalí, The Impresario of Surrealism, London 2004, pp.86–7.
Silvia Borghesi, Dalí, Madrid 2004, p.63.
Patrice Schmitt, Étude psychoanalytique de la creation chez Salvador Dalí, Nimes 2004, fig.4.4.
Montse Aguer, Obra completa. Albúm Dalí, Barcelona 2004, p.121.
2004   A. Gaultier, The Little Book of Dalí, Paris 2004, pp.74–5.
David Lomas ‘“The Metamorphosis of Narcissus, 1937”’, in Dawn Ades (ed.), Dalí, The Centenary Retrospective, London 2004, pp.270–1.
L.-S. López Herrero, La Cara oculta de Salvador Dalí, Madrid 2004, p.251.
T. Raquejo, Dalí: Metamorphosis, Madrid 2004, pp.112, 120, reproduced on front cover.
Rafael Santos Torroella, El Primer Dalí, 1918–1929: Catálogo razonado, València 2005, p.391.
Manel Guerrero (ed.), Dalí. Noves fronteres de la ciència, l’art i el pensament, Barcelona 2005, p.71.
L. García de Carpi, Salvador Dalí, Salamanca 2005, pp.99, 131 (detail).
Astrid Ruffa, ‘Les “espèces d’espaces” de Dalí surréaliste: Vers une réappropriation de la physique einsteinienne’, in Astrid Ruffa, Philippe Kaenel and Danielle Chaperon, Salvador Dalí à la croissée des savoirs, Paris 2007 p.67.
Matthew Gale (ed.), Dali & Film, exhibition catalogue, Tate Modern, London 2007, p.151.
Montse Aguer, Dalí: The Treasures of Salvador Dalí, New York 2009, reproduced front and back cover, pp.46–7.

When Dalí visited the aging psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud (1856–1939) in London in July 1938, he brought one painting with him: Metamorphosis of Narcissus. Freud wrote to the Austrian-born writer Stefan Zweig (1881–1942) the following day:

until now I was inclined to regard the Surrealists – who seem to have chosen me as their patron saint – as 100% mad (let’s say 95%, as with alcohol). This young Spaniard, with his ingenuous fanatical eyes and his undeniable technical mastery, has suggested to me a different appreciation. In fact, it would be very interesting to explore analytically the creation of such a painting.1

Dalí began painting Metamorphosis of Narcissus in Zürs, in the Austrian Alps, in the spring of 1937. Its subject is based directly on the Greek myth of Narcissus, a beautiful boy who was highly sought after by would-be suitors, but too proud to offer his love in return. According to the version of the story retold in Ovid’s Metamorphoses (c.8 AD), one of Narcissus’s rejected lovers invoked the goddess Nemesis to punish Narcissus for his arrogance. Nemesis complied, and one day, when Narcissus bent down to drink from a clear pool of water, he caught a glimpse of his own reflection and was completely overcome with love. He tried in vain to embrace his reflection, and when his love could not be reciprocated, he fell into such despair that he beat his breast until he died. In his place bloomed a lovely white flower with a yellow centre: the narcissus.

Given Dalí’s fascination with transformation – evidenced extensively in his double-image paintings, such as Mountain Lake 1938 (Tate T01979) – it is possible to understand why the Narcissus myth was so stirring for him. However, Metamorphosis of Narcissus differs from many of his other double-image paintings in that, rather than seeing multiple images hidden within one ambiguous figure – a reclining woman who is also a horse and a lion as well, for example – the subject itself is doubled. A crouching Narcissus sits on the left side of the painting, resting his head on his knee as he peers into the lake at his reflection, while on the right hand side of the painting the form of his body becomes an ossified hand, the fingertips of which grasp an egg – the bulb from which the narcissus flower blooms.2 Thus, Dalí presents both Narcissus’s self-obsession and its disastrous outcome in the same space, but as two distinct figures. His rationale for this has not been widely discussed, though it evinces his sophisticated awareness of optical phenomena. In 1937 he wrote:

If one looks for some time, from a slight distance and with a certain ‘distant fixedness’, at the hypnotically immobile figure of Narcissus, it gradually disappears until at last it is completely invisible. The metamorphosis of the myth takes place at that precise moment, for the image of Narcissus is suddenly transformed into the image of a hand which rises out of his own reflection … Beside it can be seen the limestone sculpture of the hand – the fossil hand of the water holding the blown flower.3

Dalí’s fascination with ‘optical illusions’ has received considerable critical attention, yet little of this has been focused on his comments on how he intended Metamorphosis of Narcissus to be viewed.4 In his description, Dalí capitalises on a familiar phenomenon, namely if one stares at a fixed point for a long duration, objects appear to vanish. The effect is due to the perceptual need for constant movement – tiny saccades, or subtle jerky movements – that perpetually refocus the eye and change what the viewer sees. The optic nerve is designed to ignore images that are static on the retina. The central focus of the eye is least affected, which is why peripheral objects disappear first, but in theory, if the subject of concentration becomes a sufficiently stable retinal image, it, too, will begin to disappear from sight.5 Dalí recommended concentrating on the figure of Narcissus until it transforms into a hand emerging from the water and finally disappears, for it is at that precise moment that ‘metamorphosis’ occurs: Narcissus vanishes, leaving behind the stony hand and blooming flower.

In conjunction with Metamorphosis of Narcissus Dalí wrote an eponymous poem composed, allegedly, in order to amplify the effect of the painting.6 The poem was published in 1937 in a limited edition by Éditions surréalistes, and shortly thereafter the English poet and collector Edward James (1907–1984) undertook an English translation, which was published through the Julien Levy Gallery in New York.7 The full text of the poem is given here:

Under the split in the retreating black cloud
the invisible scale of spring
is oscillating
in the fresh April sky.
On the highest mountain,
the god of the snow,
his dazzling head bent over the dizzy space of reflections,
starts melting with desire
in the vertical cataracts of the thaw
annihilating himself loudly among the excremental cries of minerals,
between [sic] the silences of mosses
towards the distant mirror of the lake
in which,
the veils of winter having disappeared,
he has newly discovered
the lightning flash
of his faithful image.
It seems that with the loss of his divinity the whole high plateau
pours itself out,
crashes and crumbles
among the solitude and the incurable silence of iron oxides
while its dead weight
raises the entire swarming and apotheosic
plateau from the plain
from which already thrust towards the sky
the artesian fountains of grass
and from which rise,
and hard,
the innumerable floral spears
of the deafening armies of the germination of the narcissi.

Already the heterosexual group, in the renowned poses of preliminary expectation, conscientiously ponders over the threatening libidinous cataclysm, the carnivorous blooming of its latent morphological atavisms.

In the heterosexual group,
in that kind date of the year
(but not excessively beloved or mild),
there are
the Hindou
tart, oily, sugared
like an August date,
the Catalan with his grave back
well planted
in a sun-tide,
a Whitsuntide of flesh inside his brain,

the blond flesh-eating German,
the brown mists
of mathematics
in the dimples
of his cloudy knees, there is the English woman,
the Russian,
the Swedish women,
the American
and the tall darkling Andalusian,
hardy with glands and olive with anguish.

Far from the heterosexual group, the shadows of the avanced [sic] afternoon draw out across the countryside, and cold lays hold of the adolescent’s nakedness as he lingers at the water’s edge.

When the clear and divine body of Narcissus
down to the obscure mirror of the lake,

when his white torso folded forward
fixes itself, frozen,
in the silvered and hypnotic curve of his desire,
when the time passes
on the clock of the flowers of the sand of his own flesh,

Narcissus loses his being in the cosmic vertigo
in the deepest depths of which
is singing
the cold and Dyonisiac siren of his own image.
The body of Narcissus flows out and loses itself
in the abyss of his reflection,
like the sand glass that will not be turned again.

Narcissus, you are losing your body,
carried away and confounded by the millenary reflection of your
your body stricken dead
falls to the topaz precipice with yellow wreckage of love,
your white body, swallowed up,
follows the slope of the savagely mineral torrent
of the black precious stones with pungent perfumes,
your body ...
down to the unglazed mouths of the night
on the edge of which
there sparkles already
all the red silverware
of dawns with veins broken in ‘the wharves of blood’.

do you understand?
Symmetry, divine hypnosis of the mind’s geometry, already fills up your
with that incurable sleep, vegetable, atavistic, slow
Which withers up the brain
in the parchment substance
of the kernel of your nearing metamorphosis.

The seed of your head has just fallen into the water.

Man returns to the vegetable state
by fatigue-laden sleep
and the gods
by the transparent hypnosis of their passions.
Narcissus, you are so immobile
one would think you were asleep.
If it were a question of Hercules rough and brown,
one would say: he sleeps like a bole [sic]
in the posture
of an Herculean oak.
But you, Narcissus,
made of perfumed bloomings of transparent adolescence,
you sleep like a water flower.

Now the great mystery draws near,
the great metamorphosis is about to occur.

Narcissus, in his immobility, absorbed by his reflection with the digestive slowness of carnivorous plants, becomes invisible.

There remains of him only
the hallucinatingly white oval of his head,
his head again more tender,
his head, chrysalis of hidden biological designs,
his head held up by the tips of the water’s fingers,
at the tips of the fingers
of the insensate hand,
of the terrible hand,
of the excrement-eating hand,
of the mortal hand
of his own reflection.
When that head slits
when that head splits
when that head bursts,
it will be the flower,
the new narcissus,
Gala –
my narcissus.8

As discussed in depth by the art historian David Lomas, many of the elements in Dalí’s poem figure in the painting: the ‘god of snow’, for example, is a third Narcissus figure nestled among the background’s mountains, while the ‘heterosexual group’ – perhaps Narcissus’s would-be suitors – is identifiable in the mid-ground of the painting, foiling Narcissus’s self-imposed isolation.9

Lomas has also convincingly explored the homoerotic content of Dalí’s painting from the basis of the Narcissus myth itself, citing Ovid’s Metamorphoses: ‘many men, many girls desired [Narcissus]; but (there was in his delicate beauty so stiff a pride) no men, no girls affected him’.10 Lomas makes a convincing link with Caravaggio’s (1571–1610) Narcissus c.1600 (Galleria Nazionale d’Arte Antica, Rome) and the treatment of the ‘phallic knee’, which Dalí ‘goes one better’ by twinning with its reflection, creating what might be read as buttocks.11

The last line of the poem, in which Dalí identifies Gala as ‘his narcissus’, is compelling. Lomas notes that there is a less popular variant of the Narcissus myth, cited by Pausanias in his second-century Guide to Greece, in which the tragic hero falls in love with his own reflection not because he recognises it as himself but because he sees in his own face the visage of his beloved, deceased twin sister.12 In identifying his wife Gala as ‘his narcissus’, Dalí may be fashioning her as his double – a possibility advanced further by his tendency to merge his name with hers. With this in mind, it might be significant that Metamorphosis of Narcissus, like many other works of the period, is signed, ‘Gala Salvador Dalí’.

Dalí began Metamorphosis of Narcissus by priming a fine linen canvas with lead white pigment in linseed oil. Infrared radiography (IRR) reveals that Dalí drew elements of the composition, probably in more than one drawing medium at different stages of the painting’s progression. According to Patricia Smithen, Head of Painting Conservation at Tate:

One medium is quite granular, with particles caught up in the surrounding paint. This feature is seen in the small figure group in the centre of the painting and in the checkerboard figure. There are dotted lines on the edges of the checkerboard squares and more dotted lines in the red ground below the checkerboard. The dots may be caused by the pencil or ink skipping lightly over the canvas. At the bottom of the checkerboard are also small measurement lines – perhaps squaring the area for perspective. There are some areas of shading or hatching visible, notably in the area next to the head of the large kneeling figure. This large figure appears to have been outlined with additional shading and hatching in graphic pencil, with the paint following the contours of bits of drawing that are visible with IRR ... There are a few extant sketches for this work ... But no full drawings of the composition exist. It appears to have been worked up in stages, using different media: graphite pencil and possibly charcoal or pen and ink.13

Edward James, who spent time with Dalí and Gala at Zürs (where Dalí started the painting) and who had already arranged to purchase the picture upon its completion, noted the existence of preparatory drawings in a letter to the gallerist Julien Levy in response to Levy’s request to purchase the painting from him:

For the moment, seeing that he has done nothing else quite like this – and in view of the fact that I watched it steadily grow: for I was there when the canvas had its first pencil mark put on it, and even saw the preliminary sketches for the picture before the big canvas was begun at all: I feel such an attachment for it that I could not bear to re-sell it to anybody without having at any rate contemplated it for a bit in its finished state.14

In 1945 the short-lived surrealist journal Vrille published a fine, very finished drawing of the central figure, which may have been one of these preliminary sketches referred to by James.15 The drawing is remarkable for its subtle use of the double image: in the finished painting the brooding Narcissus and the bony hand bearing the egg and flower are separate forms, but in this drawing they are combined – the left leg of Narcissus reads also as a thumb and his arm as a finger, the two delicately holding the head/egg.

Smithen also notes that Dalí employed two distinct artistic styles in his painting. For the figures and areas where there is underdrawing, he used carefully applied brushstrokes, but the stones, cliffs, trees and foliage were painted in a considerably looser style. According to Smithen:

It seems clear that Dalí [had] more trouble with the right quarter of the composition than the rest. In this area are the most changes, alterations and underdrawing which does not match the painted surface. The checkerboard, red and green ground beneath it and the dog have all been worked in one of these ways. In comparison, the rest of the composition shows no such changes or alterations.16

Smithen further added that Dalí used a much wider range of pigments in Metamorphosis of Narcissus than is generally found on a single painting: ‘vermilion, Mars red, madder on an aluminium-based substrate, cadmium orange, cadmium yellow, chrome yellow, Mars yellow, cobalt blue, cerulean blue, viridian, bone black, Mars brown, sienna, lead white and zinc white.’17

A final technical detail concerns the greyhound on the right, which does not figure in Dalí’s poem. Conservators’ studies reveal that the underdrawing for the greyhound was made on top of the surrounding green ground, indicating that it was a later addition to the composition. This is confirmed in a letter from Dalí to Edward James, dated 15 June 1937:

Your little picture will surprise you … The finished Narcissus has become much more important now with the apparition of the dog which is eating the cutlets … this dog which serves as a union with the next myth of Dionysus is very good in front of this savage landscape … nothing could grow in this sterile land.18

The final touch to the painting would not be the dog, however, but the ants: according to the results of ultraviolet examination by Tate conservators, these ants, as well as many other small black flourishes throughout the composition, lie on top of even the resin varnish.19

Elliott H. King
December 2007

Supported by The AHRC Research Centre for the Study of Surrealism and its Legacies.


1 Letter from Sigmund Freud to Stefan Zweig, 20 July 1938, in Sigmund Freud and Stefan Zweig, Correspondance, trans. by Didier Plassard and Gisella Hauer, Paris 1995, p.128.
2 Dalí explained that his idea for the bulb-head was derived from a traditional Catalan saying corresponding to the psychoanalytic notion of a complex: ‘If a man has a bulb in his head, it might break into flower at any moment, Narcissus!’ See Salvador Dalí, Métamorphose de Narcisse, Paris 1937, Metamorphosis of Narcissus, trans. by Francis Scarpe, New York 1937.
3 Ibid.
4 See, for example, Dawn Ades, Dalí’s Optical Illusions, New Haven 2000.
5 In 1938 Dalí executed a paranoiac painting explicitly titled The Image Disappears (Fundació Gala-Salvador Dalí, Figueres).
6 This is not unlike Dalí’s The Great Masturbator (Le Grand Masturbateur) (Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía, Madrid), a painting that also necessarily linked to a poem with the same title published in La Femme visible, Paris 1930.
7 Meredith Etherington-Smith, The Persistence of Memory: A Biography of Dalí, New York 1993, p.222.
8 Salvador Dalí, Métamorphose de Narcisse, Paris 1937, Metamorphosis of Narcissus, trans. by Francis Scarpe, New York 1937. This translation differs from that referenced in a letter from Edward James to a Mr Kornfeld, in which James says he translated the poem into English while he and Dalí were together in the Austrian Alps in the spring of 1937. The original was written in a loose metre and unrhymed. James apparently adopted ‘a careful metrical structure and rhyme scheme’, which meant that his translation was very free. He explained to Mr Kornfeld that the poem and picture both represented the Narcissus myth and metamorphosis: ‘Being April … and the time when these flowers bloom in the Austrian Alps … the air happened to be full of that diamond-like lucency which comes with the melting snows. There is this feeling of vigorous spring both in the picture and the poem.’ Letter from Edward James to Mr Kornfeld, 12 October 1938, Edward James Archive, West Dean, Chichester.
9 David Lomas, ‘The Metamorphosis of Narcissus: Dalí’s Self-Analysis’, in Dawn Ades and Fiona Bradley, Dalí, A Mythologies, London 1998, p.88.
10 Ibid. Lomas cites Ovid, Metamorphoses, trans. by Mary Innes, London 1955, Book 3, lines 353–6.
11 Ibid., p.94.
12 Ibid., p.98.
13 Patricia Smithen, Tate conservation report, 26 July 2007.
14 Letter from Edward James to Julien Levy, 12 June 1937, Edward James Archive, West Dean, Chichester.
15 Evrard de Rouvre (ed.), Vrille: la peinture et la littérature libres, Mantes 1945.
16 Smithen 2007.
17 Ibid.
18 Letter to Edward James from Dalí, 15 June 1937, Edward James Archive, West Dean, Chichester. Dalí added a rough sketch of Narcissus at the head of the letter he wrote to James. See Nicola Coleby (ed.), A Surreal Life: Edward James, 1907–1984, exhibition catalogue, Brighton Museum and Art Gallery, 1998, reproduced p.34.
19 Smithen 2007.

You might like

In the shop