Flight of the Magnolia is part of a group of late works by Paul Nash that feature what the artist called ‘aerial flowers’. The painting depicts an unfurling magnolia blossom in flight, suspended between clouds and sea. Both the fleshy folds of the magnolia’s rounded petals and the seascape behind are realised in a pastel palette of pinks and blues, creating the impression of delicate dawn light. Nash made three versions of the painting during the summer of 1944, when he was living in Oxford, producing two near-identical watercolours on paper (now in the collections of the Victoria and Albert Museum in London and the Santa Barbara Museum of Art in California) before working up this larger, final version in thickly applied oil paint.
Elements of this scene may be traced to a trip that Nash made in September 1943 to Dorset with his close friend Lance Sieveking, a British writer and BBC producer. During this visit, Nash made a quick study of a magnolia flower given to him by another friend, Gillian Barnard. ‘For months’, Nash later wrote in a letter to Barnard,
the drawing remained just another study yet I felt quite certain it had a more important destiny. Then just recently I arrived at my ‘aerial flowers’ series … the magnolia became air borne & it took to the element as a duck to water ... If you like the picture, feel you helped to make it or indeed caused it.
(Quoted in Pennie Denton, ‘Paul Nash and the Blue Pool’, Dorset Life – The Dorset Magazine, May 2013, pp.46–7.)
In his own recollections of the trip, Sieveking links Flight of the Magnolia to an unusual cloud formation that he and Nash glimpsed on their last morning in Dorset (Sieveking 1957, pp.79–83).
Despite these connections, the setting of Flight of the Magnolia is left undefined. In this respect, the painting differs from much of Nash’s previous work, which explores the character of specific landscapes. Rather than pursuing this tendency, Flight of the Magnolia’s vision of a flower in the sky brings Nash’s early interest in the mystical qualities of paintings by Samuel Palmer and William Blake – evident in works such as The Pyramids in the Sea 1912 (Tate T01821) – to bear on his longstanding fascination with flight and the sky. These subjects gained new emphasis for the artist during the late 1930s, as military attacks from the air became an increasing threat. In an essay from 1945, named after his ‘aerial flowers’ series, Nash describes how the Second World War affected his perception of the sky:
When the war came, suddenly the sky was upon us all like a huge hawk, hovering, threatening. Everyone was searching the sky, expecting the terror to fall: I among them scanned the low clouds … hunting the sky for what I most dreaded in my imagining. It was a white flower. Ever since the Spanish Civil War the idea of the Rose of Death, the name the Spaniards gave to the parachute, had haunted my mind, so that when the war overtook us I strained my eyes always to see that dreadful miracle of the sky blossoming with these floating flowers.
(Nash 1945, pp.158–9.)
While the flower in Flight of the Magnolia may be seen to relate to this vision, Nash also suggests in the same essay that his sky-bound flowers serve as ‘equivalents’ for his imaginative activity more generally (Nash 1945, pp.160–1). At the end of the essay, he addresses his experiments with airborne flowers in light of his own mortality: ‘it is death I have been writing about all this time … death, I believe, is the only solution to this problem of how to be able to fly’ (Nash 1945, pp.160–1). Many writers on Nash have highlighted this conclusion when interpreting Flight of the Magnolia, which was painted when the artist’s health was in decline, and just two years before his death. For example, Nash’s first biographer, Anthony Bertram, describes the image as ‘the last flight of the soul … in the form of a flower’ (Bertram 1955, pp.296–7).
The mysterious image in Nash’s painting provided the basis for a recent 16mm film, Our Magnolia 2009, by the British artists Rosalind Nashashibi and Lucy Skaer, which begins and ends with two extended shots of the canvas.
Paul Nash, ‘Aerial Flowers’, Counterpoint, no.1, 1945, pp.1–8, reprinted in Andrew Causey (ed.), Paul Nash: Writings on Art, Oxford 2000, pp.135–61.
Anthony Bertram, Paul Nash: The Portrait of An Artist, London 1955, pp.296–7.
Andrew Causey, Paul Nash, Oxford 1980, p.320.
Supported by Christie’s.
Does this text contain inaccurate information or language that you feel we should improve or change? We would like to hear from you.
Technique and condition
Flight of the Magnolia is painted in oil on linen canvas. Paul Nash used a commercially-prepared linen canvas that had a thin layer of glue size, a white oil priming and is stretched on a standard four-member expandable softwood stretcher that has mitred mortise and tenon joints.
Working from a squared-up drawing, Paul Nash divided up the canvas into a grid and then drew the outline in pencil. He painted each area in turn, generally working wet-in-wet, following the contours of the form with his brush. As successive layers were added the impasto grew deeper and more sculpted. Nash painted the sky up to the edge of the magnolia with horizontal strokes and arcs and dabs for the clouds. The sea is thinly painted yet each mark holds the passage of brush hairs and leaves a lip at the top of each stroke.
The paint is very glossy and well-bound. An inscription on the reverse of the stretcher states that the painting was varnished in 1948, after Nash’s death. This varnish had discoloured and was removed in 2002 during the conservation treatment. The painting now bears a very thin spray coat of varnish to protect it from surface dirt.
Mary A. Bustin
- emotions, concepts and ideas(16,926)
- symbols and personifications(7,285)
- religion and belief(8,393)